Stop Genocide

Shirking Responsibility So Soon, Mr. President?

Published March 10, 2009 @ 05:32PM PT

In her first appearance before the UN Security Council earlier this year, US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice committed the Obama Administration to upholding the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, also known as R2P:

"As agreed to by member states in 2005 and by the Security Council in 2006, the international community has a responsibility to protect civilian populations from violations of international humanitarian law when states are unwilling or unable to do so," Rice told the council in a closed-door session.

"The United States takes this responsibility seriously," Rice said, according to a transcript of her remarks.

Given the Administration's remarkable timidity in the face of catastrophic events in Darfur over the last week, I've taken the liberty of revising the UN statement on R2P, to more accurately reflect what Obama's --- and the rest of the world's --- "commitment" to the principle actually looks like, these days.

UN 2005 World Summit Outcome

Responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity

138. Each individual State has the responsibility to protect option to worry, if quite convenient, about its populations (but only the ones that it likes) from as it commits genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. This responsibility gentle nudge entails the prevention of such crimes, including their incitement, through appropriate and necessary means. We accept pay lip service to that responsibility suggestion --- really guys, no pressure --- and will at least pretend that we intend to act in accordance with it. The international community should, as appropriate convenient, encourage and help States to exercise avoid, if not thwart outright, this responsibility bit of friendly advice and support the United Nations in establishing an early warning capability turning a blind eye to the most obvious and egregious of "early warning" signs and ongoing atrocities.

139. The international community, through the United Nations, also has the responsibility option, if so desired (no need to put yourself out), to use appropriate totally spineless and half-ass diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means, in accordance with Chapters VI and VIII of the Charter, to help to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. In this context, we are prepared are too self-interested and short-sighted to take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner after years of waffling, through the Security Council, in accordance with the Charter, including Chapter VII, on a case-by-case basis and in cooperation with relevant regional organizations as appropriate if they're being nice to us, should peaceful means be inadequate and national authorities are manifestly failing refusing to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity which they continue to perpetrate, and flaunt in our faces. We stress suggest, timidly, the need for the General Assembly to continue consideration of the responsibility to protect worry about (again, only in front of the cameras) populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and its implications, bearing in mind the principles of the Charter and international law. We also intend to commit ourselves (in a very non-committal way, of course. Can I get a photo of me signing this?), as necessary and appropriate, to helping being complicit as States build capacity to protect their populations from continue genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and to assisting ignoring those which are under stress before crises and conflicts break out, out of our own utter lack of a backbone. (Really, should see a doctor about that.)

140. We fully support the mission of the Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide. We have a Special Adviser of the Secretary General on the Prevention of Genocide?

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1.  "We stress the need for the General Assembly to continue *CONSIDERATION* of the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and its implications, bearing in mind the principles of the Charter and international law".

    Even without your truthful re-edit this line alone shows what they are. Spineless, money hungry, selfish cowards. CONSIDERATION Ha!!!!
    Love your re-edit by the way makes much more sense and is truthful at least.

    Posted by Andrea M on 03/11/2009 @ 01:23AM PT

  2. R. U.

    Very accurate revision, tragically.

    Posted by R. U. on 03/11/2009 @ 11:16AM PT

  3. KTJ Scott

    Very good Michelle. As R. U. noted, and tragic. I have been pondering why we, as humans, are more likely to make declarations such as R2P and show outrage after the fact rather than standing up and trying to end the violence, rape, murder, genocide. I think it has everything to do with the fact that people do not want to bear responsbility to act. So they look away while it's going on, and when its over, they look, and say, "How could we let this happne." And then, since it is over, they bear no responsibility. And so they have the opportunity to continue on with their lives, not skipping a beat in their daily activities or disrupting their mundane conversations with horrors. And that is why people choose to sit down and look away, because if they look, if their bear witness, then they have a responsbility to be an active witness - an advocate.

    In my mind, there is nothing more worthwhile then honoring all those we have lost in the past and promised, "Never Again," with action for those who are suffering today.

    Posted by KTJ Scott on 03/12/2009 @ 09:27AM PT

  4. Ruth Gonzalez

    Michelle, kudos once again to you! I found the re-editing quite interesting. I don't give a flying hoot what any friggin U.N. official says about condeming the Sudanese goverment, you've been whining about this for YEARS!! Get your butt's in line and do SOMETHING!! But you know, I've lost all faith in the member nations and the U.N. and as for Obama.....well he's been in office for two months so I'll hope that he listened to Clooney and us activists to take action. But the question is how many more lives will be lost because of it?

    Posted by Ruth Gonzalez on 03/13/2009 @ 11:03PM PT

  5. Jessica Sprenkle

    So the question in the end is just what do we do about this?  Since obviously politictians aren't the way to go...

    Posted by Jessica Sprenkle on 03/14/2009 @ 05:27AM PT

  6. KAT POWERS

    <3

    LOVE

    KAT

    A TIGERESS.

    of sorts.

    :(

    Posted by KAT POWERS on 06/22/2009 @ 03:56PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Michelle .

Michelle became involved in the anti-genocide cause at a young age, and has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns, ever since.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.