Stop Genocide

Ready to Rumble, Indeed: In Defense of Save Darfur

Published January 25, 2009 @ 08:17PM PT

Alternate Title #1: I am Activist, Hear Me Roar

Alternate Title #2: Don't Judge a Movement by its Poster

A few days ago, my fellow Changester Michael Kleinman "threw down the gauntlet" with a post on the International Criminal Court, followed by one on UN Under-Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs John Holmes' scathing criticism of the Save Darfur Coalition.

Consider the gauntlet picked up.

John Holmes seems to base his criticism --- or, as Michael said it best, "sweeping condemnation" --- of the entire Save Darfur movement on the content of a few posters, from a publicity campaign conducted three years ago. This amounts not just to a snap judgment, but a huge slap in the face to thousands of dedicated activists, boiling down their efforts to an ill-conceived slogan, and tossing them aside like last week's garbage.

Humanitarian aid workers deserve the utmost respect for their resilience and determination, for entering and enduring the world's worst places in order to extend life-saving assistance to those caught in the middle of chaos and conflict. But advocates back home have a role in this, too. By the very nature of their work, humanitarian workers cannot be the ones fighting to end the conflict itself --- in order to remain in a country, humanitarian organizations must maintain political neutrality. International activists, however, are under no such obligation.

The political will to end genocide and mass atrocity is not organic --- it must be demanded. While Save Darfur clearly exaggerated the death toll in Darfur in its 2006 poster campaign, the collective efforts of a million activists that year put Darfur on the political radar in this country, and have kept it there ever since.

Would states, cities, universities, and private companies have divested their holdings from Sudan without the work of the Sudan Divestment Task Force? Without GI-Net's "Ask the Candidates" Campaign, would Obama, Clinton, and McCain have made such strong statements about Darfur during their presidential campaigns? Did Gwen Ifill devote time during a tight presidential debate to Darfur just because she cared? Would media coverage of Darfur, the ICC, and so on in 2008 have been so substantial if it weren't for Team Darfur and Dream for Darfur's media blitzes in the run up to the Beijing Olympics? We can never truly know the answer, but I think it's fair to say that Darfur gets significant attention now because of thousands of advocates kicking up the dust, shouting to sky, grabbing everyone who will listen (and even some who won't) and saying, "This must end NOW."

The Save Darfur Coalition, along with partners such as GI-Net, ENOUGH, STAND, and Stop Genocide Now are more than an email list with occasional activist alerts. The collective voice of anti-genocide advocates is channeled through high level, behind-the-scenes advocacy by the organizations' government relations teams, and --- yes --- international teams, including networks of researchers and informants on the ground in Darfur.

True, we have not yet reached the tipping point, where we can exert the precise amount of pressure needed to motivate the change we seek. But these things do not happen overnight --- social movements develop in fits and starts, leaps forward followed by missteps and stumbles. But we have made progress, and each small victory gets us closer to the ultimate goal: The end of hostilities and the restoration of peace and stability for the people of Darfur.

I think that the crux of Holmes' frustration is this: Khartoum tends not to react nicely to the demands for change levied by international advocates, and humanitarian workers and the people they serve often bear the brunt of the regime's frustration. However, to blame advocates for this is misguided. The Save Darfur movement cannot be blamed for the fact that humanitarian aid has become another pawn in Khartoum's genocidal game.

And even more, to venture back into the land of hypotheticals, who's to say that the situation would be any better without the activist movement?

What would John Holmes have us do? Remain silent? Because that's been such a successful tactic in the past?

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (6)

  1. Mia Olis

    I guess they would rather the publicity be made when the issue is being talked about in hindsight, studied in a scholarly manner, and at a point where blame could be passed around. Not right now, when there is still a lot we can do to help. Whatever exaggerations there were, the goal was never a secret: to get the world's attention on this issue, and rightfully so.

    There IS genocide happening; but for some people, an even more vivid, albeit grotesque, picture must be painted for them to really realize how horrible the situation is. Whatever exaggerations there were were made as an appeal to those people who would otherwise be indifferent to the issue.

    Posted by Mia Olis on 01/25/2009 @ 08:56PM PT

  2. Reply to thread
  3. Jessica Moreland

    Posted by Jessica Moreland on 01/26/2009 @ 08:51AM PT

  4. Paul  Currion

    Michelle - I've left a comment on Michael's response to this post, which explains my thinking in a bit more depth, but I thought I should say something here as well.

    Preventing and ending genocide are truly worthwhile goals. The problem I have with Save Darfur is that I'm not convinced a) that genocide is happening, or that it ever was, and b) that an external actor such as Save Darfur can have significant impact. I can definitely change my mind on both of these issues, but I need to see better arguments than the ones presented here

    Posted by Paul Currion on 01/28/2009 @ 02:17AM PT

  5. Ali Dahmash

    As much as Darfur concerns me as its a huminatrian conflct by all means, as much as I doubt why teh West is so concerned by yet another African genocide. Is it because of the Oil and Gold in that part of Africa or is it that Politicians woke up with a concious? Hmm makes me wonder
    check this link
    http://www.twf.org/News/Y2004/0807-Darfur.html

    Posted by Ali Dahmash on 01/29/2009 @ 07:53AM PT

  6. Hassan Idriss

    Up

    Hand in hand to stped this conflict and acheive the entertaiment to Darfur.

    Posted by Hassan Idriss on 01/31/2009 @ 12:33PM PT

  7. Just reread this post, Michelle. This is really a great piece ... from here on out, I'm going to share this with anyone who raises objections similar to Holmes'. Thanks again for all of your work. -N

    Posted by Nikki Serapio on 02/15/2009 @ 01:59PM PT

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Michelle .

Michelle became involved in the anti-genocide cause at a young age, and has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns, ever since.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.