Presidential Silence in Beijing on Sudan
Published November 18, 2009 @ 09:04AM PT
This is a guest post by Jerry Fowler, Save Darfur Coalition president.
Less than a month after his Administration proclaimed in its new strategy for Sudan that “American leadership is essential to a more effective multilateral approach,” President Obama left China early this morning without any public reference to having brought up Sudan with his hosts. There were background statements to journalists that it was on a list of things discussed. Such low-key treatment was a huge missed opportunity to enlist the support for the new strategy from a crucial country. It also was a rejection of the recent, bipartisan plea by 44 Members of Congress:
As you prepare to visit China, we strongly urge you to make Sudan a priority in your bilateral discussions. As you are well aware, China is a major arms supplier and source of economic strength to the regime in Khartoum, and has a vital role to play in any ultimate resolution of the multiple crises in Sudan.
The Congressional letter echoed a petition signed by tens of thousands of citizen-activists who asked for President Obama to call on the Chinese to work with the U.S. and:
Use their economic and political influence with Sudan to support the Darfur peace process, full implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), and significant structural, political and judicial reforms to Sudan.
The President’s public silence on Sudan in Beijing follows on a similar silence by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her recent visit to Egypt – another country that is crucial to bringing peace to Sudan. Their failure to raise Sudan publicly in bilateral meetings with key countries sends an unfortunate message to the Sudanese government and other key actors: The United States is not leading for peace in Sudan.
Michael Gerson recently summed up the urgent need for leadership:
Only a president and his secretary of state can insist on boldness.
Absent that insistence, America's Sudan policy is in a holding pattern, waiting for the next crisis to refocus global attention. Meanwhile, women are raped, with impunity. Weapons are illegally imported, with impunity. Civilians are attacked, with impunity. And at some point, impunity becomes permission.
The “unstinting resolve” that Candidates Obama and Clinton pledged last year is needed now, more than ever.
Comments (8)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Jerry Fowler, Save Darfur Coalition president, is a recognized authority on responding to genocide and related crimes against humanity. Prior to his work at the coalition, Fowler was the founding director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Committee on Conscience. Fowler has also served as legislative counsel for the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights and as special litigation counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice. He has taught at George Washington University Law School and George Mason University Law School.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Email

The concern expressed in this message from Jerry Fowler resonates with me. However I believe that the urgency of offering leadership in soliciting collaborative efforts from China and Egypt is something that President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton are both aware of and are on top of... I feel that they do have a strategy on challenging China on its role in supplying arms to the Sudan and enlisting the support of Egypt. It may be premature to talk about diplomatic efforts that may be underway...
As we do not know what steps are being taken diplomatically or otherwise, Mr. Fowler's note of concern is appropriate to remind all of what is at stake in the midst of President Obama's trip to the far east and the need for the present admninistration to seize this opportunity to exhibit leadership in resolving this crisis.
Posted by Milton L. Butts, Jr., Ph.D. on 11/18/2009 @ 09:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It's not the "job" of the U.S. to do anything about "Darfur" or or any other foreign country.
When are we going to learn to stay out of foreign countries?
Wearn't we supposed to learn our lesson from *Vietnam?* Since then we've gotten involved in how many foreign countries to the tune of how much?
And how many lives in the military lost?
The U.S. is not an "Empire" like the U.K. used to be. That's *another* lesson to be learned!
As a Citizen, Taxpayer and Veteran I'm getting really tired of all this "Adventurism" that each successive administration in Washington seems to want to get "us" and our Taxdollars to the benefit of big business, involved in!
If President Obama doesn't have us out of Iraq and Afganistan and, as far as I'm concerned, S.Korea and Germany by 2012, stick a fork in him, he's done!
The Taxdollars of the fifty million people in the U.S. without healthcare go to help build *hospitals* in *foreign countries!* Oh yeah, THAT makes a lot of *common sense!*
The people in Washington *exist* to *SERVE* the American people and should never have any allegience to foreign countries.
They're not there to try to "dictate" to us!
That type of thinking needs to end!
If individuals want to donate their own private funds to foreign countries fine, no problem, that's the way it should be done but it shouldn't involve TAXPAYER DOLLARS! Or U.S. Troops!
Growing up my parents taught us to, "mind your own business" and they were absolutely right!
That goes for *countries* too!
Posted by Thomas Porter on 11/22/2009 @ 12:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Eh....it's not the same, I'm afraid.
Was there a genocide declared in Vietnam? Right.
I agree very much so that there is a fine line between foreign aid and imperialism, but this is a humanitarian cause. Yes, this is the same argument that is perpetually used in foriegn invasions, but the absolute atrocities that have been committed merit at least some attention.
Ah, the arugment of hospitals in foreign countries. The United States, I'm afraid, needs to be more than a one-race pony. Putting completele emphasis on domestic problems while wholly ignoring international issues is not, and never will be, the right path. Balance, that's it, balabce.
I recently attended a lecture given by an Sudanese refugee in Louisville, KY. The conflict, he believes, could be settled in one day with the intervention of the United States. Is he being too optimisitic? Maybe, but his comment reflects the inaction taken since he has come to the United States.
Posted by Ibrahim Jadoon on 11/22/2009 @ 03:45PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"But this is a humanitarian issue."
Aren't they all!
That doesn't give anyone the right to rip off U.S. Taxpayers though does it?
Hey! Here's an idea for you, how about you try to convince another country to solve your problems for you? Say,...Romania or Peru! Or better still, solve your own problems!
And the U.S. needs to get out of the "Refugee" business too! Once they get here they never want to leave in accordance with the Geneva Accords.
We STILL have "refugees" here from Bosnia/ Kosovo and there hasn't been any shooting there in years! When will they be repatriated?
That was another thing we should never have gotten involved in! And we STILL have Troops there for how many years now? At how many tens of billions of Taxdollars?
Just *WHEN* do those countries start paying us back all that money?
But, they can *NEVER* replace the Soldiers who died!
I'm sick and tired of my Troops dying in foreign countries for no reason!
The U..S. is not the French Foreign Legion!
Posted by Thomas Porter on 11/23/2009 @ 01:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mate...I think we're getting off-topic. No one is wanting soldiers on Sudanese ground. No one.
We're looking for pressure from the government on China, who has been actively supplying the Sudanese army. Any type of physical interventions should *not* be undertaken by the US. We all know all the problems that has caused.
Also, it's called common courtesy, virtue, maturity: doing good things without expecting anything in return, anyways.
Posted by Ibrahim Jadoon on 11/23/2009 @ 01:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It is our duty as HUMANS to see to it that genocide does not take place. Remember that saying "Never Again?" Well it's happening right now and our government has the capacity to make significant change if we were to act on that power. This is nothing like Vietnam!
We should have learned from our mistakes in Rwanda. And unfortunately, unless people speak up and put pressure on the government nothing seems to get accomplished.
Posted by Chasity D on 12/03/2009 @ 12:46AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Chastity, "Never Again?" That slogan is a Jewish slogan adopted after WW2 meaning that they (Jews) will "never again" be treated like they were by the Nazis.
That's what the Jews have decided. It's meant "for" the Jews, otherwise don't you think Israel would have Troops in the Sudan?
And if this is actually a "genocide" how many were killed last week, month, 6 months ago? Got any figures?
"Our mistakes in Rwanda?"
And which "mistakes" did we make in Rwanda? That had nothing to do with the U.S. if a bunch of savages wanted to hack each other up with machetes, what business was that of mine sitting in Woburn, Massachusetts at that time?
(Wasn't Bill Clinton at the helm then?)
It's not the job of our govt to get us involved in the problems of foreign countries! We are not the Fire, Police, Social Workers, "peacekeepers" or anything else sitting around "waiting for the call" of foreign countries!
You're potentially putting some mother's son in harm's way when that happens.
They're not paid to do that kind of thing!
And look what happens if we do like in Kosovo, tens of billions spent, "foreign aid", "nation building", "refugees", "asylum seekers" and it never ends!
If (you) feel so strongly about it and want to play "Great White Bwana"learn to use weapons, get a bunch of like-minded people together and fly over there and start killing the" bad guys." We'll call you "The Lincoln Brigade Two."
And what about (other) African countries? Shouldn't (they) be helping out?
They can contain the problem "in-house" so to speak.
What if they were having a "Genocide" in China? Russia?
The reason why certain people want to try to get the U.S. involved comes down to one word; $money$.
They think that if the U.S. goes over there we'll be building hospitals, schools etc, etc.
I don't want my Taxdollars used like that!
We have 50 million people in the U.S. without health care, should we really be using their Taxdollars to be building hospitals overseas?
Chastity, if you were walking down the street one night and two drunks poured out of a bar room fighting would you go over and get involved in it? I doubt it!
If two guys rob a bank is it somehow "my fault" because they "grew up poor in the inner city with no father figure?"
I joined change.org a few years ago because we have problems in the U.S. that need to be adressed and because I couldn't stand Bush.
I don't understand why there's more of a focus on "foreign issues" now that not a lot care about and that seem to be watering down our other more important issues here like homelessness that we really can help to do something about!
I saw a bunch of people evidently living under a bridge here in S.Carolina a few weeks ago and it disturbed my greatly.
But instead of running around like an hysterical person standing next to a garden hose yelling "Somebody DO something!" while their neighbor's house is on fire I cut an extra check to the local homeless shelter and told them which bridge those people were under and called my congressman's office about getting any kind of help to homeless people.
Trust me, their staffers couldn't care less about "Darfur."
That's not what we're paying them for.
Posted by Thomas Porter on 12/03/2009 @ 09:40PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Today before you say an unkind word - Think of someone who can't speak.
Before you complain about the taste of your food - Think of someone who has nothing to eat.
Before you complain about your husband or wife - Think of someone who's crying out to GOD for a companion.
Today before you complain about life - Think of someone who went too early to heaven.
Before whining about the distance you drive Think of someone who walks the same distance with their feet. And when you are tired and complain about your job - Think of the unemployed, the disabled, orphans/ and other vulnerable children, people living with Hiv/Aids/ bed ridden, and those who wish they had your job.
And when depressing thoughts seem to get you down - Put a smile on your face and think: you're alive and still around.
1 JOHN 4:8
http://www.MySocialURL.com/r/lecden/
http://www.benefitbar.com/benefitbar/subscribe/toolbar.php?toolbarId=3904
Posted by steve Safari on 11/23/2009 @ 07:08AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.