Genocide and the Ohio Second
Published July 02, 2009 @ 08:58PM PT
Genocide denial has become a big issue in the race for Ohio's 2nd Congressional seat.
David Krikorian, a "grandson of survivors of the Armenian Genocide" according to his candidate biography, is running against incumbent Jean Schmidt, co-chair of the House Turkish Caucus.
Last November, days before his first contest against Schmidt, Krikorian demanded in an open letter:
"her immediate withdrawal from this race and her apology to the people of the United States of America for the crime she has committed against our American soldiers and humanity by denying the undisputed facts of the Armenian Genocide."
Krikorian claimed that Schmidt, during House debate on US recognition of the Armenian genocide in 2007, said:
"The question comes to the definition of genocide and I don't think we are comfortable making that attribution at this time".
Krikorian told voters:
"The only deniers of this great tragedy which led to the Holocaust of the Jews by Nazi Germany are the Turkish Government and certain members of the United States Congress including Jean Schmidt [...] Jean Schmidt is a self-serving politician and an embarrassment to her district and to the United States of America. The people of Ohio's second district will, if they elect her on November 4th, condone her denial of the Genocide of 1.5 million Christians. And, in so doing, be guilty of a crime against humanity as the cover-up is just as bad as the crime."
Schmidt won that race with 45% of the vote. Her Democratic opponent received 37%, and Krikorian, running as an Independent, received 17%.
Now, nearly a year and a half before the November 2010 election Schmidt is suing Krikorian (now running as a Democrat) for his 2008 statements.
In May, the Ohio Election Commission ruled there was probable cause that Krikorian's statements violated election law. Now, Krikorian has teamed with a high-power lawyer to mount his defense, and the trial is schedule for August 13.
And Schmidt is receiving her share of support. Advertising a recent fundraiser, the Turkish American Political Action Committee noted:
During the last election period, since she did not agree with and fought against the Armenian "Genocide" claims in the Congress, slander campaigns were carried out against her by her competitor, Ohio candidate David Krikorian. Jean Schmidt won the election and, with our support, sued David Krikorian for making false claims and insulting her and she urgently needs our financial support.
This will definitely be a race to watch. If not for the implications for party control of the House, or which shade of purple Ohio might turn - it will at least be interesting to see how controversies surrounding a massive atrocity from nearly a century ago affect the outcome of a Congressional race in Ohio today.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Remembering Armenia
-
Obama on Armenia: When is a Promise Worth Breaking?
-
Apologies to the Armenians: Better Late than Never
Comments (1)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Genocide is the gravest crime against humanity and we should stand against any attempts aimed at using genocide claims as a political instrument as much as we must stand against genocide itself!
This is why I find Krikorian's tactics against Schmidt unacceptable. This is a false and utterly unethical defamation campaign with an ethnic-racist overtones.
The debate about a disputed Armenian genocide today has more to do with politics than with history. Armenia uses this dispute to stir up anti-Turkish sentiments and keep alive its territorial claims against Turkey. This issue should be left to historians and not politicians of different sorts to decide.
As to the essence of the debate, consider the following response by the UK government to an Armenian lobby inquiry in 2007 on whether deaths of Armenians in Ottoman Empire could be categorized as genocide: The response read:
"Neither this Government nor previous British Governments have judged that the evidence is sufficiently unequivocal to persuade us that these events should be categorised as genocide as defined by the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide, a convention which is, in any event, not retrospective in application".
(Source: www.number10.gov.uk/Page13999)
Posted by David Somer on 08/19/2009 @ 03:11AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.