Failing Our Peacekeepers
Published August 18, 2009 @ 08:56AM PT
How does it feel to be set up to fail? You might want to ask a peacekeeper. Commitment to peacekeeping seems to run rather shallow, as world leaders refuse to match their bold in-front-of-the-camera promises with adequate support and mandates for the missions they deploy.
A harrowing account from a journalist from Sarajevo, which glides back and forth between memories of the war and a mass burial of Srebrenica victims, speaks with disdain, or maybe more remiss, of the UN peacekeepers who left thousands of civilians to the devices armed belligerents with genocidal plans. The 160 Dutch peacekeepers, who faced harsh criticism after the incident, were fighting a losing battle, overwhelmed by thousands of Serb militia and without any reinforcements.
Commander Romeo Dallaire faced a similar challenge just a year before, as Operation Broken Silence reminds us in a recent post on the Responsibility to Protect. Dallaire sent a series of communiqués with UN headquarters in New York in 1994, which have now become symbolic of international complicity in the face of genocide, describing with fierce urgency the plans he'd uncovered, and his suggestions for how to stop them before they were put into motion. He was told this was outside of his mandate. Over 800,000 Rwandans lost their lives in a mere 100 days.
In Darfur and the DRC, peacekeeping missions are chronically under-resourced for their missions. The peacekeepers themselves are not at fault for this --- rather, politicians, diplomats, and envoys commit to peace and protection in grand speeches, authorize missions in much-lauded votes at the UN, and then fail to provide the support necessary for the troops to fulfill cripplingly weak mandates. Just getting helicopters for UNAMID has been like pulling teeth.
With all of their troubles, these missions do have a positive impact for civilians caught in war zones, and those nations that do contribute troops and equipment are under-appreciated. But securing adequate deployment of peacekeeping missions requires so much of our bandwidth that it seems to distract attention away from the larger issues at hand, to the gain of belligerents and the detriment of civilians.
[Photo from The Guardian: Haitian rioters block a street in downtown Port au Prince while Brazilian UN peacekeepers look on. Photograph: Kena Betancur/EPA.]
Share this Post
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
EmailRelated Posts
-
"There is such a thing as effective international justice"
-
Obama on Darfur: Options and Obstacles
-
The Stagecraft of Making it Look Like an Accident
Comments (2)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Michelle became involved in the anti-genocide cause at a young age, and has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns, ever since.
Well, I think too, the main reasons for the peacekeepers failed or lead them toward a bigest failing is the less contributions and support for the troops and equipments. However; it's seem that quite a little bit successes done on the real defacto's, but this still required them continiouing in their efforts to protect the civilians basic rights availability(foods, water,energy) inside the camps and beyond.On other hand, the weakness of the troops and the equipment will not change the peacekeeping missions dramatically, while is required to retreated and re-planning it again and seek deeply about the possibility of every postive impacts achieve the peaceful and devoloped in the whole regions ultimatly.
Peace up on those peoples died and lost their basic live insurance...Peace to Darfur and all the world wide regions.
Together toward sttoping the genocide anywhere;anytime.
Posted by Hassan Idriss on 08/18/2009 @ 12:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
More evidence of the difference between talk and action with regard to political will to influence events.If the political will had been there,the Dutch could have called in massive airstrikes and wiped out the Serbs.They knew that they would not be supported in such an action,and so they,and so stood aside,however unwillingly.
Posted by Matthew Kallem on 11/16/2009 @ 12:50PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.