Don't Mention the War
Published May 16, 2009 @ 02:12PM PT
I watched The Reader on my flight home from London yesterday --- it's a bit slow, for my taste, but presents an interesting snapshot of the post-WWII German society's struggle to deal with the crimes of the Nazi era.
And, seeing as how satire and occasional inappropriate humor grace the pages of our blogs, I was reminded of a brilliant episode of the short-lived and underappreciated British sit-com Fawlty Towers. (Add it to your Netflix queue, if you haven't seen it yet.) To set the scene: John Cleese plays a hotel owner who, after suffering a head injury, acts even more ridiculous than usual in front of his German guests.
In all seriousness, though, the legacy of WWII and the Holocaust remains a very difficult and sensitive issue for German society. For those of you interested in the more academic dynamics of this struggle, read up on the "Historikerstreit," or "Historian's Debate" (or "quarrel," depending on your translator), of the late 1980s, during which German intellectuals debated, via various media outlets, remembrance and the role of the Nazi era in German history.
I'm a particular fan of Jurgen Habermas's contribution to the debate, which began with an article titled "A Kind of Settlement of Damages" in Die Zeit in July 1986. Habermas criticizes other historians of presenting a revisionist view that sought to detach Nazism from the trajectory of German history, and argued instead:
"After Auschwitz our national self-consciousness can be derived only from the better traditions in our history, a history that is not unexamined but instead appropriated critically. The context of our national life, which one permitted incomparable injury to the substance of human solidarity, can be continued and further developed only in the light of the traditions that stand up to the scrutiny of a gaze educated by the moral catastrophe, a gaze that is, in a word, suspicious."
(I can't find the Habermas article online, but it is reproduced in the book "A New Conservatism.")
Habermas's idea of an "educated gaze" should speak not only to German society, but to a global constituency that seems far more comfortable with bemoaning moral catastrophes than averting them.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Much Ado About 'Basterds'
-
Respect for Holocaust Victims, Long Overdue
-
Rush Limbaugh on Healthcare and How Not to Use Your Brain
Comments (2)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Habermas said something similar at the opening of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa. (Also not online, but in the first chapter of my favourite book ever: Country of My Skull, by Antjie Krog.)
Another great Habermas quote?
“There is no collective guilt. Whoever is guilty must answer for it individually. At the same time, however, there is such a thing as a collective responsibility for the mental and cultural context in which mass crimes become possible. And we are similarly inheritors of past events.”
Posted by Transitionl... . on 05/22/2009 @ 09:10PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Excellent quote.
Posted by Michelle . on 05/22/2009 @ 09:36PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.