Stop Genocide

Darfur Developments in 2008: Indictments and Escalation

Published October 15, 2008 @ 09:03PM PST

Violence in Darfur has taken on a new character in 2008, with new fronts of confrontation and an ever-decreasing space for humanitarian access to the region. The latest estimates put the total death toll of the genocide at 300,000. The UN Security Council voted to extend UNAMID’s mandate through July 2009, but the force remains fatally under-staffed and ill-equipped—often unable to protect itself, much less the civilian population in Darfur.

Government-sponsored attacks continue to target civilians under the guise of routing out insurgency, with a particularly sharp increase after an attack on Omdurman, a suburb of Khartoum, by the Darfuri Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) in May. The surprise attack, so close to Khartoum, shattered the regime’s myths of security and control, and revealed that the rebels are becoming an even more serious threat to the regime’s stability. Violent reprisals by the government against civilians in North Darfur included the bombing of villages, arbitrary detentions, torture, rape, summary executions, and more.

ICC Indictment Proceedings

On July 14, Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo presented evidence to the International Criminal Court (ICC) purporting to show Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir’s clear intent to commit genocide against ethnic groups in Darfur, including his central role in financing and directing the attacks of the Janjaweed militia. Ocampo requested an indictment against al-Bashir on charges of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in Darfur. A three-judge pre-trial panel is expected to rule on the matter this fall.

Al-Bashir reacted (predictably) harshly against the possibility of an indictment, and has drawn a surprising cadre of supporters in his efforts to pressure the UN Security Council (UNSC) to suspend the proceedings. Supporters of the invocation of Article 16, the section of the Rome Statute of the ICC that enables to UNSC to suspend indictment proceedings, claim that an indictment will interfere with the peace process in Darfur—although no viable peace negotiations are currently underway.

The African Union and Arab League have been particularly vociferous in their opposition to the ICC, with the support of UNSC permanent members China and Russia. However, the US is particularly adamant in its opposition to Article 16—surprising many, given the Bush administrations distaste for the ICC—and France and the UK would also likely veto such a resolution unless Khartoum makes substantial strides towards ending the conflict.

Escalating Violence

Rather than make substantive moves towards peace in the wake of a possible ICC indictment, al-Bashir continues to attack villages in Darfur—always under the pretense of counter insurgency measures, but nearly always targeting civilians. Rebel groups in Darfur accused the government of carrying out a string of attacks in North Darfur since August, often following the regime’s usual M.O. of aerial bombings followed by ground attacks by the army and Janjaweed militias. In August, Sudanese security forces raided Darfur’s largest camp for internally displaced persons (IDP’s), Kalma, killing at least 31 civilians, though some estimates are higher.

The deteriorating security situation is seriously impinging upon access for humanitarian relief workers, and constant government scrutiny and interference further hinders the delivery of assistance. Many organizations, including Doctors Without Borders, evacuated staff after a series of violent attacks.

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment. In the process we will also create a Change.org account for you so you can track this and future conversations. Don't worry - we won't spam you. We just want to promote constructive dialogue and find that people are more respectful when they are not anonymous.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Subscribe to RSS Feed

Michelle . Michelle .
Washington, DC

Michelle became involved in the anti-genocide cause at a young age, and has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns, ever since.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.

[X]

Attend the Presidential Inauguration!


The Case Foundation, a partner of Change.org, is running a campaign called "Change Begins With Me," which calls on citizens across the country to get involved by answering the question: how will YOU commit to bringing about change in your neighborhood, your community or your nation?

The winner will receive 2 tickets to the Presidential Inauguration and the Hawaii Inaugural Ball as well as flight and hotel accommodations in Washington, DC.

No idea is too big or too small. Everyone has a role to play.

To enter the competition, in 250 characters or less, complete this phrase:


Change begins with me.   I commit to...
 

160 characters left

 
 
 
 
I am 14 years or older and agree to the terms of service
I believe that Change Begins With Me. Please keep me informed about other Case Foundation initiatives.