Contemplating Peace on Earth
Published December 25, 2008 @ 05:10PM PT

Peace on earth, good will towards men. Such a simple concept.
I don't talk about religion often, and am not about to wax theological here, but I will say this: I believe that there's more that unites than divides us in religion, and that faiths everywhere are fundamentally rooted in peace.
And yet religion is used everywhere to condone violence and mass atrocity. People---and in my field, violent dictators in particular---wrap themselves in the protective cloak of religion, invoking God's name to justify their actions---as a shield, or a mask, that creates a buffer between them and their destructive agendas, removing, in their minds, individual accountability by transposing it on to the shoulders of the divine.
But the mask is a transparent one. Violence is purely man's work.
I don't claim to know where God is, and I (unlike others) certainly am not arrogant enough to claim to speak on his/her/its behalf, but I cannot believe that the act of senseless slaughter does anything but subvert the principles of any religion on this planet. If there is the hand of a higher power in creation, I cannot believe that creation was divinely destined for self-destruction.
Violence is purely man's work.
Chief among the fallacies implicit in religiously-justified violence is that nothing can be done about it. If this is God's will, well then good luck trying to stop it. But while humans have the ability to wreck absolute havoc, to push the extremes of cruelty, we also have the ability to stop it. And yet more often than not, we don't. We find our own reasons-masks, cloaks, degrees of separation between us and those left utterly unprotected against the hand of violence, creating a divide with reasons which, when considering the stakes, ultimately seem meaningless. Yet with this divide, we justify our inaction, we go about our lives, perhaps with an occasional cheer for human rights, perhaps a prayer, and a donation to <insert charity here>.
And I use the collective "we" consciously, recognizing that there are many among us who dedicate their lives to action in the face of atrocity, but also noting that as a collective, we have yet to come together to effectively push for meaningful change in the way the world responds to despots and dictators.
Wherever you find God---or wherever you don't---whatever you believe in, is there any acceptable excuse for inaction in the face of atrocity?
Peace on earth, good will towards men. Such a simple concept.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Can We Overcome Our Short Attention Spans?
-
Urgent Action for Prisoner of Conscience in DRC
-
Are My Rights Really All That Different From Yours?
Comments (3)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















This was such a thoughtful post, Michelle, with so many truths on so many fronts. I've referred to this post elsewhere (i.e., on the AR blog and on Twitter) as beautiful or gorgeous, and it occurred to me after doing so that what I meant to say, really, was that your way of putting it was beautiful, that the heart and thought here were beautiful--because the content of the post itself is, of course, sad. Thought-provoking but sad.
It can indeed be frustrating and overwhelming to look out at the world and see so much turning away, so much seeming indifference. But then I meet someone like you, who's doing incredible, real work to make this world a better one, and my hope is renewed.
Posted by Stephanie Ernst on 12/25/2008 @ 09:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I second that emotion. Great job, Michelle. You really are a brilliant writer.
But for my two cents:
I think religion was originally a way to organize people. When the ability to read was something only the privileged could afford, and paper was considered a rarity, people didn't have a way of communication other than going to church, or the temple, or whatever they might have called it. Naturally, it didn't take much thought for some leader to say, "Oh! I can get all of these people to fight wars for me!!" So in the older scriptures, war was written into religion. This is a very important thing that people of all relgions should consider. How to get them to think of <i>some</i> parts of religion as a very primitave form of public relations, without sounding blasphemous, would be a tricky manuever.
Of course, at the source of any conflict there's greed. The crusades were fought for the wealth of Jerusalem. In the middle east today, it's oil. In Zimbabwe, diamonds. Of course, Religion is still thrown-in.
I guess this leaves me with,
<b>Greed is the direct opposite of peace.</b>
So then, how do we eliminate greed, while creating peace?
Of course, there is no easy answer, but I think it happens on a subtler level. Like, just being generous to a friend, or a neighbor.
Heck I'm not one to talk, as much as I argue with my fellow bloggers! We can all do our part by, AT LEAST, just keeping anti-greed and pro-peace ideas floating around somewhere in the back of our minds. <b>ANTI-GREED, PRO-PEACE: THIS IS AT THE SOURCE OF ALL TWELVE (and counting) OF THE CAUSES AT CHANGE.ORG.</b>
Posted by John Thompson on 12/26/2008 @ 03:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Change.org has an entire blog dedicated to Middle East---the aptly named Peace in the Middle East blog, written by Charles Lenchner.
Posted by Michelle . on 01/04/2009 @ 05:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.